CREEP Literature Review 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

CREEP Literature Review 3 - Essay Example In addition, this protocol applies to all special procedure units where aspirations, biopsies, or visualization through scopes may be performed. In 1997, the writer personally experienced an incident that took place in an operating theatre at a local hospital. Fortunately, a wrong site surgery on the patient was avoided on the last minute, hence leaving the patient unharmed and safe. According to this experience and to the writer, responsibility is an important part of being a member of the operating theatre management team; the writer in this literature review will essentially try to cover the most important elements and researches for wrong site surgery to answer the research question â€Å"What are the potential solutions to prevent wrong site surgery?† The search strategy used the following sources – MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, BNET, PubMed, OVID and ScienceDirect; additionally, primary sources such as AORN, Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing and Journal of American College of Surgeons were also used throughout research. Search terms used were ‘Surgical errors’, ‘Site Surgery’, ‘Surgical site’, ‘Wrong site surgery’, ‘Wrong procedure’, ‘Wrong person surgery’, ‘Communication failures in the Operating Room’. There was no location restriction in this literature review. All entries were in the English language or with abstracts in English that were viewed because of the paucity of ‘clinical trials’ or ‘systematic reviews’. These searches were made between 2000 and 2008. Due to the depth of this important topic a total of (the number will be add later) articles were only identified using the above sources and eight articles were chosen from those that were reviewed. The majority of the research conducted was done in the United States. Five major themes were identified in the literature review: definitions of wrong site surgery, the

LEGISLATION IS INTRODUCED TO PROTECT UNMARRIED COHABITANTS Essay

LEGISLATION IS INTRODUCED TO PROTECT UNMARRIED COHABITANTS - Essay Example Under the Children Act 1989, an unmarried mother has the sole parental responsibility over her children however this was amended under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 where parental responsibility shall be acquired by the father if he is registered as the child’s father; there is a parental responsibility agreement; or when the court orders that he shall have parental authority upon his application.  Under the Children Act 1989, an unmarried mother has the sole parental responsibility over her children however this was amended under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 where parental responsibility shall be acquired by the father if he is registered as the child’s father; there is a parental responsibility agreement; or when the court orders that he shall have parental authority upon his application.   The legislative pronouncement protecting cohabitation may be used by couples who are prescribed by law to marry by reason of legal impediment or public policy to cir cumvent the law. A case in point is B & L v the United Kingdom where a parent-in-law is prohibited from marrying their child-in-law unless both had reached aged 21 and both their respective spouses had died. B was L’s father-in-law, and they wished to marry. L’s son treated his grandfather, B, as ‘Dad’. However, upon application to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), it was ruled that the prohibition violates the right to marry notwithstanding its laudable and legitimate aim of protecting the family and any children of the couple. The prohibition was based primarily on tradition and considering the same situation, no legal prohibition exists when the couple would engage in an extra-marital relationship.   In fine, there are enough laws to protect the interest of unmarried cohabitants. They must only be vigilant in protecting their rights and interests so that they may not be unduly deprived of their rights and interests.... Under the Children Act 1989, an unmarried mother has the sole parental responsibility over her children however this was amended under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 where parental responsibility shall be acquired by the father if he is registered as the child’s father; there is a parental responsibility agreement; or when the court orders that he shall have parental authority upon his application.  Under the Children Act 1989, an unmarried mother has the sole parental responsibility over her children however this was amended under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 where parental responsibility shall be acquired by the father if he is registered as the child’s father; there is a parental responsibility agreement; or when the court orders that he shall have parental authority upon his application.   The legislative pronouncement protecting cohabitation may be used by couples who are prescribed by law to marry by reason of legal impediment or public policy to cir cumvent the law. A case in point is B & L v the United Kingdom where a parent-in-law is prohibited from marrying their child-in-law unless both had reached aged 21 and both their respective spouses had died. B was L’s father-in-law, and they wished to marry. L’s son treated his grandfather, B, as ‘Dad’. However, upon application to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), it was ruled that the prohibition violates the right to marry notwithstanding its laudable and legitimate aim of protecting the family and any children of the couple. The prohibition was based primarily on tradition and considering the same situation, no legal prohibition exists when the couple would engage in an extra-marital relationship.   In fine, there are enough laws to protect the interest of unmarried cohabitants. They must only be vigilant in protecting their rights and interests so that they may not be unduly deprived of their rights and interests. Any legislation that would be enacted would put the cohabitation relationship at par with marriage and civil partnership is a mockery to the institutions. It would further erode marriage and civil partnership and from the growing number of couples choosing to cohabit without the benefit of marriage or civil partnership, it is marriage and civil partnership that need protection. Unmarried cohabitation should be left alone to give the parties freedom to choose but they cannot invoke protection as this is a direct assault on the institutions of marriage and civil partnership.